Fri 26 Mar 2021 16:00 - 16:30 at Virtual Space A - Session 16 Chair(s): Theo D'Hondt
Context: An island parser reads an input text and builds the parse (or abstract syntax) tree of only the programming constructs of interest in the text. These constructs are called islands and the rest of the text is called water, which the parser ignores and skips over. Since an island parser does not have to parse all the details of the input, it is often easy to develop but still useful enough for a number of software engineering tools. When a parser generator is used, the developer can implement an island parser by just describing a small number of grammar rules, for example, in Parsing Expression Grammar (PEG).
Inquiry: In practice, however, the grammar rules are often complicated since the developer must define the water inside the island; otherwise, the island parsing will not reduce the total number of grammar rules. When describing the grammar rules for such water, the developer must consider other rules and enumerate a set of symbols, which we call alternative symbols. Due to this difficulty, island parsing seems to be not widely used today despite its usefulness in many applications.
Approach: This paper proposes the lake symbols for addressing this difficulty in developing an island parser. It also presents an extension to PEG for supporting the lake symbols. The lake symbols automate the enumeration of the alternative symbols for the water inside an island. The paper proposes an algorithm for translating the extended PEG to the normal PEG, which can be given to an existing parser generator based on PEG.
Knowledge: The user can use lake symbols to define water without specifying each alternative symbol. Our algorithms can calculate all alternative symbols for a lake symbol, based on where the lake symbol is used in the grammar.
Grounding: We implemented a parser generator accepting our extended PEG and implemented 36 island parsers for Java and 20 island parsers for Python. Our experiments show that the lake symbols reduce 42 % of grammar rules for Java and 89 % of rules for Python on average, excluding the case where islands are expressions.
Importance: This work eases the use of island parsing. Lake symbols enable the user to define the water inside the island simpler than before. Defining water inside the island is essential to apply island parsing for practical programming languages.
Thu 25 MarDisplayed time zone: Belfast change
15:00 - 16:30 | Session 11Research Papers at Virtual Space C Chair(s): Jeremy Gibbons Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford | ||
15:00 30mLive Q&A | Functional Programming in Pattern-Match-Oriented Programming Style Research Papers Satoshi Egi Rakuten Institute of Technology, Rakuten, Inc. / The University of Tokyo, Yuichi Nishiwaki The University of Tokyo DOI Media Attached | ||
15:30 30mLive Q&A | Lake symbols for island parsing Research Papers Katsumi Okuda The University of Tokyo / Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Shigeru Chiba The University of Tokyo DOI Media Attached | ||
16:00 30mLive Q&A | Programming Paradigms, Turing Completeness and Computational Thinking Research Papers Greg Michaelson Heriot-Watt University DOI Media Attached |
Fri 26 MarDisplayed time zone: Belfast change
15:00 - 16:30 | |||
15:00 30mLive Q&A | Using Relational Problems to Teach Property-Based Testing Research Papers John Wrenn Brown University, Tim Nelson Brown University, Shriram Krishnamurthi Brown University, United States DOI Media Attached | ||
15:30 30mLive Q&A | Reference Capabilities for Safe Parallel Array Programming Research Papers Beatrice Åkerblom Stockholm University, Elias Castegren KTH, Tobias Wrigstad Uppsala University, Sweden DOI Media Attached | ||
16:00 30mLive Q&A | Lake symbols for island parsing Research Papers Katsumi Okuda The University of Tokyo / Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Shigeru Chiba The University of Tokyo DOI Media Attached |